1 Topic by Pvpede

  • Pvpede
  • Pvpede
  • Donor
  • Offline

Topic: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

Hi !

I don't know if this is a complete fucked up idea, and I don't even think that it'll get through.

I found out that TeeWorlds have the function called "dbg_bots", which will make a player that is called: (invalid client) - and it'll just stand still and actually do nothing .

The idea came through my head:
"Why don't you make a bot-function?" - Would it even be possible?


Thanks,
Pvpede

Core2Quad QX9650 12MB 4x3,00GHz - Razer Lachesis - Corsair 8 GB XMS2 DDRII PC6400 RAM DualChannel - Nvidia GeForce 9800GX2 1GB PCI-E - Windows Vista Ultimate EN 64-bit

2 Reply by Somerunce

  • Somerunce
  • Somerunce
  • Developer
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

This has been discussed in many other threads but it isn't something that the devs will do.
The debug bots are really stupid, they just hammer all buttons.

Making a bot isn't very easy and would require much skills. Today it is very hard to do it.

3 Reply by Pvpede

  • Pvpede
  • Pvpede
  • Donor
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

Okay.

Core2Quad QX9650 12MB 4x3,00GHz - Razer Lachesis - Corsair 8 GB XMS2 DDRII PC6400 RAM DualChannel - Nvidia GeForce 9800GX2 1GB PCI-E - Windows Vista Ultimate EN 64-bit

4 Reply by Jon

  • Jon
  • Jon
  • Member
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

Where does one type Dbg_bots in?

I need to figure out something to put here.

5 Reply by FireArrow

  • FireArrow
  • FireArrow
  • Member
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

Jon wrote:

Where does one type Dbg_bots in?

Don't use them. dbg stands for debug, and that's whats they are there for.

Used to be very active waay back

6 Reply by matricks

  • matricks
  • matricks
  • Developer
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

Using the "bots" (I would call em dummies) can crash your server if you use them incorrectly. All the dbg_* stuff should be left alone.

7 Reply by Mauri

  • Mauri
  • New member
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

These dbg_bots dont working for me. I write dbg_bots 1 in the .cfg but nothing happens oO

8 Reply by a'

  • a'
  • Member
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

It's a console command, not a server flag.

9 Reply by Landil

  • Landil
  • Landil
  • Developer
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

matricks wrote:

All the dbg_* stuff should be left alone.

Antoine de Saint Exupéry: It seems that perfection is reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Besides -  I am the gfx guy!

10 Reply by buffer[] (edited by buffer[] 2010-02-14 11:21:13)

  • buffer[]
  • buffer[]
  • Support Staff
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

+1 for Landil.
Btw, it is a server flag, but the command isn't dbg_bots, and the command is protected.
I won't tell, but anybody with a little brain could find it -_-

|ZPote| buffer[]'s posterous

11 Reply by Azon

  • Azon
  • Azon
  • Member
  • Offline

Re: [SUGGESTION] Improving DBG_BOTS

As this is (very) old news it seems that we can close this for now.

As has been stated many times, don't (try to) use these features when there's no need to.