[ Closed ] Official Aimbot Discussion (Page 2 of 5)

so my idea is good?
it will be an external app with closed source

if mouse movements are different from cursor movement there must be a cheat... !!!
so IT IS POSSIBLE to detect bots... ^^

what!?!?!? XD if the clients detect that mouse movement is different from cursor movement, it call the server tool that ban for x minutes the Ip of the client...

If you have a bot, mouse movement/key pressing is different from the real. So it can be detected.

I had only the idea, it is possible to make it, it will take a lot of work but it is possible...

Hi!

What do you think about this concept?

My tool would detect known aimbots through detecting injected/manipulated code and the injectors

After finishing my current project, I could try to realize this one

We are not agree with you, because on our servers we coded auto-anti-cheater systems, and they were about to be correct. But it is hard to make them 100 % reliable, and we don't want to ban honest players, even just one time.

And stop incredible and no open-source projects !!! TeeWorlds is a free game, else make a fork with your own servers which can be played only with your binary client !!!

You can't decompile native compiled code (you would get a shitload of assembler commands)

There are serval techniques to prevent packet manipulation, manipulations of the client and to detect self written fake anti cheat clients which could send for example MD5 sums which are always OK.

Take a look at the anti cheat tool Punkbuster by Evenbalance which is used for the most multiplayergames from EA (electronic arts). It works perfectly,...

Did you even read 1 post in this thread? You can just modifiy the client so it doesn't search for the aimbot...

There are people able to read this assembly, and there is packet sniffer. It will take much more time, as matricks said, to write that protection that to break it. And you can not persuade people to use such a tool.
There was spend many $$ to develop protection that will prevent people from ripping of DVDs, and guess what, it got broken few hours after release by 17 years old boy...

OMFG!! Thats a good ide

Don't Think Before Shooting Just Shoot 

,,,JOIN MY CLAN   <[The-G]>

"Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither" - Ben Franklin.

Who the hell wants to run proprietary crap because of a few cheaters? I'd rather play on private servers with people I trust only. And by the way -- as a professional software developer, I'm telling you: if someone wants to cheat, they will find a way around your system. You are only wasting your time, but heh, everyone needs a hobby.

Creating such a tool is not easy...

The netcode will base on already written classes of my older private projects,...
Monitoring memory etc. and integrating the serverside app into the teeworlds server will be the hardest part.

But I don't know if other players would download a extra tool to join protected servers. This depends on how much serverproviders would use this anti cheat app

Although it is certainly true that the developers can update their bots a lot faster then we can counteract them, it are rarely the developers that actually use the bots. Last month's uprising of bots was mainly caused because some developers made their bots leak making them spread pretty fast among the community. Many people who never had the intention of using bots gained free access due to posts that stayed open for a few hours and uncontrolled IRC spam. Now the not so good players all of sudden could give themselves the illusion that they had become good, and at the same time get the attention which they hope to achieve with their childish behavior.

Now if we would at least try to disable some of these bots, and while the developers would eventually develop new ones, it would still take quite some time before this spread among the community. Moderators could monitor the official forum a bit better in order to prevent bot leaks, and fansites should take their responsibilities as well. The IRC channels related to Teeworlds should ban anyone who gives links to host sites. Yes, in time those that want bots will gain access to them by means of other ways, but this could take a while and can only be done by those that actually want to invest their time into tracing, contacting and accessing the developers. As long as the community controls the distribution paths (forum, websites, irc) we should be able to gain some kind of an advantage on those that develop this software.