1

Topic: Suggestion about voting

It would be cool if the voting system only counts the votes and do not count the not voting tees as vote for no.
Its stupit that someone call a vote to change map and some tees vote for yes nobody for no and the rest just dont vote and the vote faild... so the no vote seems to be pointless -.-

i hope understand what i mean xD

uptee - a simple web interface for hosting and maintaining teeworlds servers
teerace - a website gathering results of trusted Race-mod servers providing global ranking and statistics
*gV* rox ^^

2

Re: Suggestion about voting

The reason for the no voting is that the voting can be dismissed earlier if it's just stupid. Not much use for it in 0.5.0 because the voting time is just 10 seconds, and that will be increased.

3

Re: Suggestion about voting

yea... i read the ticket... but even it is longer some pl wont vote and the vote faild but all who voted voted for yes... thats crap sad

uptee - a simple web interface for hosting and maintaining teeworlds servers
teerace - a website gathering results of trusted Race-mod servers providing global ranking and statistics
*gV* rox ^^

4 (edited by William Tee Riker 2009-01-14 15:41:25)

Re: Suggestion about voting

I know that problem from other games (Battlefield 2).
And I agree that people who don't vote should *NOT* be counted as "No".
Because a lot of people won't realize what voting is or don't care.

5

Re: Suggestion about voting

So, how can an AFK'er vote if he is threatened to be kicked?

6 (edited by Sushi Tee 2009-01-14 15:56:41)

Re: Suggestion about voting

ok i guees some ppl are against my suggestion and some admit xD

so @devs... what do u think about an option to turn it on or off like that "sv_all_vote" in rajh's old race mod? smile
it would be very cool wink
and btw... to that ticket with voting time... u could make it changeable smile

uptee - a simple web interface for hosting and maintaining teeworlds servers
teerace - a website gathering results of trusted Race-mod servers providing global ranking and statistics
*gV* rox ^^

7

Re: Suggestion about voting

Sub Focus wrote:

So, how can an AFK'er vote if he is threatened to be kicked?

The idea behind votekick is that it should offer a good way to remove those who're disrupting a game, whether that's by spamming, flaming or being afk. People that aren't playing for a significant amount of time should join spectator, or if they don't be forced to do so, because they can seriously disbalance a team.

If someone who doesn't actively play but still uses up a playerspot in a game doesn't want to get voted out he should become active, start playing and vote NO. If he doesn't come online he'll be voted out and can join again when he becomes active.

8

Re: Suggestion about voting

Another thing about voting system is that it doesn't show who created the vote.
I think that's bad. Those lammers that just want to disturb the game gain anonymity.

check out these maps: infiltrate - choco - dustycloud

9

Re: Suggestion about voting

Slinack wrote:

Another thing about voting system is that it doesn't show who created the vote.
I think that's bad. Those lammers that just want to disturb the game gain anonymity.

Even when we would know who starts the votes it wouldn't change much. The persons usually don't play with their real name and we wouldn't be able to take any disciplinary actions against him. I think it's much more important that the number of votes you can start is limited to 1 every 5 minutes or something. This would prevent people from abuse while still having multiple options to do a suggestion by voting for it.

10

Re: Suggestion about voting

Azon wrote:
Slinack wrote:

Another thing about voting system is that it doesn't show who created the vote.
I think that's bad. Those lammers that just want to disturb the game gain anonymity.

Even when we would know who starts the votes it wouldn't change much. The persons usually don't play with their real name and we wouldn't be able to take any disciplinary actions against him. I think it's much more important that the number of votes you can start is limited to 1 every 5 minutes or something. This would prevent people from abuse while still having multiple options to do a suggestion by voting for it.


Of course the name would help, i would just look at who started the random silly vote, and ban him. thats it..

*** JUSTICE ALWAYS WINS ***

11

Re: Suggestion about voting

Azon wrote:

I think it's much more important that the number of votes you can start is limited to 1 every 5 minutes or something. This would prevent people from abuse while still having multiple options to do a suggestion by voting for it.

This is a good idea, too.

check out these maps: infiltrate - choco - dustycloud