Dune wrote:Sigh. The point is not the bad it does, it's just your arguments for why it's ok to have clients giving advantages that seem fallacious to me.
If you want to have a discussion, cut the insulting tone away.
My argument was perfectly fine.
The problem is your oversimplificating logic that you apparently consider to be "clever".
Basically I explained my opinion about there not being any reason at all to consider the constant laser-beam anything even near a cheat.
Since you seemed to have a different view, I wrote "the ONLY reason to even consider putting it anywhere near cheating" was that it hasn't been included in the standard client.
What's so hard about understanding the word "only" ?
constant laser-beam ---> The ONLY argument to consider it ANYWHERE NEAR cheating (it still isn't cheating...) would be that some clients have it, others don't. Therefore not every player knows about it, not every player can use it.
aimbot ---> BESIDES not every player being able to use it, the one and most important criteria for cheating applies here: AIMBOTTING NEGATES THE SKILL TO AIM ITSELF. Therefore it reduces the game nearly to absurdity. ("Nearly" because you still have certain other skills that are important. ---> A game like Moorhuhn/crazy chicken would indeed be reduced to total absurdity as there is no other aspect about the game than aiming.)
Because of this essential difference your cheap strawman does not work at all. The sentence "Since you can't stop people from using it the answer clearly has to be to integrate it into the standard client!" only applied to the constant laser-beam. You tried to generalize it in my name by using it for aimbots ---> oversimplification and straw man.
Oh, also I don't see what your problem with my first comment is. I did not insult you as a person once. If you can't deal with people calling one of your comparisons "stupid" (with explanation of course) then maybe you shouldn't participate in discussions at all.
Oblique. wrote:I must say that I agree with Dune. If you want to use it, of course nobody can stop you. Just don't demand that it be implemented into the standard client and shit on Dune for disagreeing with you.
1. In contrast to Dune I actually try to give arguments for my claims. Dune on the other hand just wants to find (non-existent) mistakes in other people's arguments. Even if he found any, it still wouldn't support his point. At the very best it would make it an argumentative draw. The only "argument" Dune thought of himself is that a constant laser-beam is "unteeish and ugly". Wow.
2. What is your definition of "shitting on another person"? As already mentioned, I did not insult Dune once.