You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Teeworlds Forum → Maps → [CTF] ctf_guano
# Download:
https://downloads.teeworlds.com/solidfi … _guano.map
# Gametype: ctf
# Players: 4on4/5on5
# Credits_Graphic: graphics by teeworlds
# Screenshots:
http://i.solidfiles.net/f82219759e.png
http://i.solidfiles.net/0af6399822.png
http://i.solidfiles.net/ddd8cdf598.png
http://i.solidfiles.net/dcd4ac2200.png
# Note:
vegetation is not really dense 
Used 0.7 tilesets, so map got quite big
Looks quite nice 
I will try it out tomorrow.
First look leaves good impression. This seems to be really nice map. This may have some movement disadvantages, but structure and pickup placement looks to be just fine. I'll test it soon and provide further feedback afterwards.
Reminds me so much of ctf_lava. Or maybe it's just me :D
Thank you, dodedodo and Variecs, who obviously are so good at Teeworlds they can instantly tell how good a map is without even playing it! I'm sure BeaR appreciates it.
Looks quite nice
First look leaves good impression. This seems to be really nice map. This may have some movement disadvantages, but structure and pickup placement looks to be just fine. I'll test is soon and provide further feedback afterwards.
Thank you, dodedodo and Variecs, who obviously are so good at Teeworlds they can instantly tell how good a map is without even playing it! I'm sure BeaR appreciates it.
I'm not saying it's good. I'm saying my first impression is good and that i will try it out later to make sure. And yes, I think BeaR appreciates that.
I just played it. And I like it 
Only it seems to me that the bottom part is a bit to fast. You can easily grab the flag and get back really fast.
Other than that I think it's a good map!
--
I have no intention to pretend like I'm some proffesional teeworlds player. I just try to help and give my not-pro player opinion. I do not say it's good or bad. I only say what i think.
--
Okay, so here's some feedback.
Structure:
Perfect, nothing to say. Even tho quite common
Movement:
On the contrary to first impression, now i think movement is just hard enough and quite agile. I would remove one tile of spikes/unhookable on each side of middle to make it easier to hook, but rest is fine.
Pickup Placement:
Only slight disadvantages. I would put rifles further from each other, but i'm not sure if you could do that. Also i would place those hearts near the base shotgun further away from shotgun, maybe in the upper corner. Rest is fine, balanced and nicely hidden.
Graphics:
Add some background. Doodads look great.
I should say that's exactly what we should look for in Map Working Group. I suggest you to propose your map, disadvantages are minor. One of the best maps i've played for a long time.
Only it seems to me that the bottom part is a bit to fast. You can easily grab the flag and get back really fast.
Nope, they are about the same actually. I spent time playing around on it with fastcap. I used only hook. Was able to get 6.5 top and 7.0 bottom.
I really like the movement of the map. It is really fluid, easy to maneuver. Only problem i saw, was at the bottom corners of the map where the rocket and 2 shields/2 hearts are. It is a bit tricky to go down grab the rocket and jump out of base smoothly. However, it is easy for other team to come into base pick them up and go up to flag though.
Lots of very quick access to health and weapons for the area around the flag.
Graphics:
Add some background. Doodads look great.
Some backgrounds can be distracting during games. I think it looks pretty nice the way it is.
Teeworlds Forum → Maps → [CTF] ctf_guano
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 3 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
